Given
that Obama’s role in the world stage is that of promoting peace and fairness
for all, I would (if I were him) not initiate any form of strike against North
Korea, unless the US or an allied nation were attacked first. Thus I believe
that a diplomatic approach would be the best course of action in this
situation, given that the side that initiates the first strike is almost always
seen as the promoter of violence and war. Additionally North Korea has built a
reputation of not following through with their threats against others, meaning
that a military strike initiated by the US on the basis of fear could be seen
as questionable. If the US were to attack North Korea, they would be seen (by
the world stage) as a primitive nation that is eager to initiate violence,
which in turn would be brought upon themselves with an almost definite
retaliation strike from the angered North Koreans. Given this, the only
definite way to maintain a positive image on the world stage and to reduce the
amount of violence possible is to approach the situation diplomatically by
resolving the issue with speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment